Merged revisions 291581 via svnmerge from

Merged revisions 291581 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8

................
  r291581 | twilson | 2010-10-13 16:01:56 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010) | 35 lines

  Merged revisions 291580 via svnmerge from
  https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.6.2

  ................
    r291580 | twilson | 2010-10-13 15:58:43 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010) | 28 lines

    Merged revisions 291577 via svnmerge from
    https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4

    ........
      r291577 | twilson | 2010-10-13 15:45:15 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010) | 21 lines

      Don't ignore frames that have been queued when softhangup'd

      When an outgoing call is answered and hung up by the far end *very* quickly, we
      may not read any frames and therefor end up with a call that displays the wrong
      disposition/DIALSTATUS. The reason is because ast_queue_hangup() immediately
      sets the _softhangup flag on the channel and then queues the HANGUP control
      frame, but __ast_read refuses to read any frames if ast_check_hangup() indicates
      that a hangup request has been made (which it will if _softhangup is set). So,
      we end up losing control frames.

      This change makes __ast_read continue to read frames even if a soft hangup has
      been requested. It queues a hangup frame to make sure that __ast_read() will
      still eventually return NULL.

      Much thanks to David Vossel for all of the reviews, discussion, and help!

      (closes issue #16946)
      Reported by: davidw

      Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/740/
    ........
  ................
................

git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@291657 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3