We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807,
since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers
incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */
-#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
+#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721
&& LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1)
? 1 : -1];
if test "$USE_PJPROJECT" != "no" ; then
if test "$PJPROJECT_BUNDLED" = "yes" ; then
-
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for embedded pjproject (may have to download)" >&5
$as_echo_n "checking for embedded pjproject (may have to download)... " >&6; }
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: configuring" >&5
--- /dev/null
+From 1281b60a1807d1285b101b6eb61c6478f29785fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: George Joseph <george.joseph@fairview5.com>
+Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:48:52 -0600
+Subject: [PATCH] aconfigure.ac: Fix autoconf issue with opencore-amrnb on
+ older systems
+
+autoconf 2.63 on CentOS6 produces a bad ./aconfigure file related to
+opencore-amrnb.
+
+./aconfigure: line 15158: syntax error near unexpected token `fi'
+
+To get around this, a 'true;' needed to be added to the Ok case of
+AC_ARG_WITH(opencore-amrnb)
+---
+ aconfigure | 3 +++
+ aconfigure.ac | 2 +-
+ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/aconfigure b/aconfigure
+index 33a08f5..4c122c2 100755
+--- a/aconfigure
++++ b/aconfigure
+@@ -7908,6 +7908,9 @@ fi
+ # Check whether --with-opencore-amrnb was given.
+ if test "${with_opencore_amrnb+set}" = set; then :
+ withval=$with_opencore_amrnb; as_fn_error $? "This option is obsolete and replaced by --with-opencore-amr=DIR" "$LINENO" 5
++else
++ true;
++
+ fi
+
+
+diff --git a/aconfigure.ac b/aconfigure.ac
+index 3e88124..5d3e833 100644
+--- a/aconfigure.ac
++++ b/aconfigure.ac
+@@ -1631,7 +1631,7 @@ AC_ARG_WITH(opencore-amrnb,
+ AC_HELP_STRING([--with-opencore-amrnb=DIR],
+ [This option is obsolete and replaced by --with-opencore-amr=DIR]),
+ [AC_MSG_ERROR(This option is obsolete and replaced by --with-opencore-amr=DIR)],
+- []
++ [true;]
+ )
+
+ dnl # opencore-amr alt prefix
+--
+2.5.0
+