}
if (!req->ignore && p->pendinginvite) {
- if (!ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_OUTGOING) && ast_test_flag(&p->flags[1], SIP_PAGE2_DIALOG_ESTABLISHED)) {
- /* We have received a reINVITE on an incoming call to which we have sent a 200 OK but not yet received
- * an ACK. According to RFC 5407, Section 3.1.4, the proper way to handle this race condition is to accept
- * the reINVITE since we have established a dialog.
- */
-
- /* Note that this will both clear the pendinginvite flag and cancel the
- * retransmission of the 200 OK. Basically, we're accepting this reINVITE as both an ACK
- * and a reINVITE in one request.
+ if (!ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_OUTGOING) && (p->invitestate == INV_COMPLETED || p->invitestate == INV_TERMINATED)) {
+ /* What do these circumstances mean? We have received an INVITE for an "incoming" dialog for which we
+ * have sent a final response. We have not yet received an ACK, though (which is why p->pendinginvite is non-zero).
+ * We also know that the INVITE is not a retransmission, because otherwise the "ignore" flag would be set.
+ * This means that either we are receiving a reinvite for a terminated dialog, or we are receiving an INVITE with
+ * credentials based on one we challenged earlier.
+ *
+ * The action to take in either case is to treat the INVITE as though it contains an implicit ACK for the previous
+ * transaction. Calling __sip_ack will take care of this by clearing the p->pendinginvite and removing the response
+ * from the previous transaction from the list of outstanding packets.
*/
- __sip_ack(p, p->lastinvite, 1, 0);
+ __sip_ack(p, p->pendinginvite, 1, 0);
} else {
/* We already have a pending invite. Sorry. You are on hold. */
p->glareinvite = seqno;