https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r174282 | mmichelson | 2009-02-09 11:11:05 -0600 (Mon, 09 Feb 2009) | 12 lines
Don't do an SRV lookup if a port is specified
RFC 3263 says to do A record lookups on a hostname
if a port has been specified, so that's what we're
going to do. See section 4.2.
(closes issue #14419)
Reported by: klaus3000
Patches:
patch_chan_sip_nosrvifport_1.4.23.txt uploaded by klaus3000 (license 65)
........
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@174301
65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-
fbb531ad65f3
struct ast_hostent ahp;
struct sip_peer *peer;
char *port;
- int portno;
+ int portno = 0;
char host[MAXHOSTNAMELEN], *hostn;
char peername[256];
int srv_ret = 0;
In the future, we should first check NAPTR to find out transport preference
*/
hostn = peername;
- portno = port ? atoi(port) : (dialog->socket.type & SIP_TRANSPORT_TLS) ? STANDARD_TLS_PORT : STANDARD_SIP_PORT;
- if (sip_cfg.srvlookup) {
+ /* Section 4.2 of RFC 3263 specifies that if a port number is specified, then
+ * an A record lookup should be used instead of SRV.
+ */
+ if (!port && sip_cfg.srvlookup) {
char service[MAXHOSTNAMELEN];
int tportno;
portno = tportno;
}
}
-
+ if (!portno)
+ portno = port ? atoi(port) : STANDARD_SIP_PORT;
hp = ast_gethostbyname(hostn, &ahp);
if (!hp) {
ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "No such host: %s\n", peername);