https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r94824 | kpfleming | 2007-12-26 18:01:47 -0700 (Wed, 26 Dec 2007) | 2 lines
make this comment explain the situation in an even more explicit fashion
........
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@94825
65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-
fbb531ad65f3
ast_log(LOG_EVENT, "Failed attempt from %s\n", ast_inet_ntoa(s->sin.sin_addr));
}
ast_log(LOG_EVENT, "Failed attempt from %s\n", ast_inet_ntoa(s->sin.sin_addr));
}
- /* If the entire session occurs in a single context switch, then it's
- * possible to get an unsafe memory condition by free()ing the memory
- * before letting other threads run at least once. This actually seems
- * like a workaround for a glibc bug.
- */
+ /* It is possible under certain circumstances for this session thread
+ to complete its work and exit *before* the thread that created it
+ has finished executing the ast_pthread_create_background() function.
+ If this occurs, some versions of glibc appear to act in a buggy
+ fashion and attempt to write data into memory that it thinks belongs
+ to the thread but is in fact not owned by the thread (or may have
+ been freed completely).
+
+ Causing this thread to yield to other threads at least one time
+ appears to work around this bug.
+ */
usleep(1);
destroy_session(s);
usleep(1);
destroy_session(s);